Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kundo Phooler Mala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kundo Phooler Mala

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification without improvement. Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable sources exists. W 42 17:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. W 42 17:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, if the infobox figure of 211 episodes is to be believed, then you'd wonder if there is anything approaching WP:SIGCOV in Bengali language. I don't think the creator should have reverted the draft move though and I am probably leaning delete, although can't reliably search bengali sources to outright say if notability can be asserted. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well, it has no article in any other language wiki, and I'm not using Gtranslate for every source that pops up to see if it is A-a RS, and B-pertinent to the discussion. If you can't source it properly, AfD isn't here to re-write it for you. Could draftify (again) I suppose, but it seems like we've been down that path already. Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.