Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkata Violence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kolkata Violence

Unreferenced, Original research and commentary. The current text sounds entirely like a blog/op-ed piece. The author/creator of the page removed my prod notice, so I'm putting it up for AFD here. --Ragib (talk) 00:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Ragib (talk) 00:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom -Drdisque (talk) 00:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:OR, WP:POV, and (possibly) WP:HOAX. No mention of this in our Kolkata article. —BradV 00:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the article for speedy deletion. I don't think we need to let the AfD run its course. —BradV 03:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note: I have declined the speedy deletion. Neither OR nor POV nor Unreferenced are valid speedy delete criteria. AfD is the correct venue for this. - Philippe 03:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom. Tavix (talk) 01:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if what was said above me is true; at any rate article is unsourced. ~EdGl 02:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Without sources, just original research. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced and un referenced Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 03:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:OR, [{WP:POV}} etc --Alchemy12 (talk) 11:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Possible Hoax--NAHID 12:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, illwritten, and questionable if this is an event notable enough to have an article of its own. --Soman (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesnt look like an article or the incident as notable , possibly a hoax , ifatall it survives then this is not the way to be left , it looks like a press news than an article .--@ the $un$hine . (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as personal essay. ~ priyanath talk 21:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well guys , I authored this article , and I admit is is basewd entirely on Original Research. Well , I live in the city of Kolkata in India , and I have seen first hand what the degraded status of Muslims in that city is. Thank you and PLEASE do not delete the atricle - I'm building on it , tracing the sources etc. I'm new to Wiki.

Shantanu786 (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I have just edited my article as well. I have made some major changes which I'm sure would enable it to qualfy for Wikipedia Standards.

Shantanu786 (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on your talk page. —BradV 22:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.