Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimber James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kimber James

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and ENT. Sourcing is below the standard required for a BLP. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 14:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Delete: Insufficient reliable secondary sources. WP:ENT applies to porn stars as WP:PORNBIO is deprecated. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography/Deletion --Whiteguru (talk) 03:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:BASIC / WP:ENT; sources are tabloid blotter insufficient for a BLP. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.