Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasama College of Education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A little unfair to expect to find much in the way of online sources for a higher education college in a country that ranks 118th out of 140 per the WEF. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 08:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kasama College of Education

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined by Phil Bridger. Original rationale was Per WP:NSCHOOL, schools must comply with WP:NORG. This does not, as it shows no coverage in independent, reliable sources whatsoever. Despite the one source Phil has added, I still consider it to be the case per WP:MULTSOURCES. SITH (talk) 14:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 02:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is listed in an official government website as provided in the sources.Tamsier (talk) 11:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does that constitute significant coverage in an independent, reliable source? I would say not. SITH (talk) 11:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"In general, all colleges and universities are de facto notable and should be included on Wikipedia." [1] That is the prevailing view of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, especially when coupled with the fact that it is a government backed institution.Tamsier (talk) 10:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further, it is not necessary to establish notability by use of the internet. As with all older organisations, especially those from developing countries, we should be slow to delete such articles as Google may not know much about them.Tamsier (talk) 11:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep higher educational institutions are almost always notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.