Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Hess (basketball)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Hess (basketball)

There is no assertion for notability or reliable sources given. I can't this ever expanding beyond this stub. Metros (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily delete as inherently non-notable: fails WP:BIO. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is a speedy candidate. Basketball refs can be notable, and Hess is a ref in what is arguably the premier college basketball conference in the US. He does get a lot of mentions in the news, but I haven't really looked through those yet to see if there's anything substantial. Zagalejo^^^ 17:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hess is also Liberty University's all-time leading scorer, for what it's worth. Zagalejo^^^ 17:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kubigula (talk) 22:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The subject doesn't seem to be notable at all. --clpo13_(talk) 22:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - clearly not notable Dreamspy (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.