Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaplan Financial Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh666 19:59, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kaplan Financial Ltd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article relies entirely on primary sources. No indication of notability.--114.81.255.40 (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I completed the AfD. ansh666 12:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. 23:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)--114.81.255.40 (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 23:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)--114.81.255.41 (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to parent company Kaplan, Inc. Some articles link to it other than through template:Graham (nav box for the corporate group), e.g. bio of Jeremy Hanley. – Fayenatic London 16:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article can be improved. Ali Fazal (talk) 17:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this is a sufficiently large division of the company to cover separately; trying to cover all the operations and acquisitions of the entire company in a single article would be exceptionally cumbersome. DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Divisions of large businesses can have their own articles. Notability is obvious. --Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.