Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanıt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kanıt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable film/TV series/other. External links all take the user to foreign-language websites that contain very little information and fail to establish notability. Very difficult to discern the subject of the article. – Richard BB 18:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --Lambiam 18:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. --Lambiam 18:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If someone wants to rescue the article (my interest in the topic is near absolute zero), here are some reliable sources giving some not entirely trivial coverage:
- "Polisin tekniklerini deşifre etmek doğru mu?". Haberturk, 28 September 2010 (in Turkish)
- "'Kanıt' üniversitede ders oldu". Haberturk, 13 December 2010 (in Turkish)
- "Polislere Komiser Kolombo dersi". Yeni Şafak, 27 December 2010 (in Turkish)
- --Lambiam 19:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Year-old Turkish cop show. Created and de-PROD'd by SPA. Refs provided in article are useless for notability purposes--primary or routine listings. Lambiam's links are a bit better, but still far short of making the case. My web searches don't find anything else to improve. If substantial coverage in WP:RS sources can be found, happy to have another look. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.