Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaidensu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 05:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kaidensu

I can't find any evidence that this martial art exists. See Kaidensu martial which results in two links (both from Wikipedia). Maybe there's a different transliteration? Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 00:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nonsense. JJL (talk) 01:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —JJL (talk) 01:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strike with Hirak and leave a note to that effect in the JMMC's underground files. WP:Hoax. Slightly more creative than the use of pressure points in PENIS AID SEX [1] [2] though so at least their editing is improving. Ha! (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources cited, none found, fails WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - absolutely no reliable sources. Just a poor article. Versus22_talk 16:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No references and Google search does not indicate that references may exist. --Belasd (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.