Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyoti Prasad Saikia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jyoti Prasad Saikia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable because the best my searches immediately found was this, this and this and this has stayed basically the same since December 2006. Pinging Bishnu Saikia. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 16:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging interested subject users Yash!, AKS.9955 and Human3015. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Google search came back with only one source. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. not sufficient evidence as either journalist or author. DGG ( talk ) 00:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Cannot find any notable facts about the person. The article mentions that he held "numerous senior and vital positions" in the Government of Assam. However, I am unable to determine which. If the specific positions were to be discovered and if they were to be notable, I'd change my !vote. As per now, just doesn't seem notable. Ya sh ! 05:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - he appears to have been a run of the mill civil servant. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches turned up nothing in support of notability. Yash's comment is pertinent, and if other sources were to show he held a notable position, that would make a difference. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.