Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Heck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW; blatantly obvious WP:BEFORE failure and a frankly puzzling assertion by the nominator that does not reflect a policy-based rationaile for deletion even if it were true - which it is not. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Heck

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlinked article Benison talk with me 15:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep A well-referenced biography of a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, who is indisputably notable. Can nominator better explain the deletion rationale? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A properly referenced biographical article whose subject clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. AllyD (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious speedy keep for all U.S. Congressmen. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 18:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.