Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Phillips-Lane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joanna Phillips-Lane

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Sarrail (talk) 01:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe she passes WP:NACTOR as she's had recurring roles in a number of TV series, (see BFI) for example, Brookside, Bread, Capital City and Soldier Soldier. There's newspaper coverage of her in the very limited newspaper archives of the 80s and 90s, some examples: Joanna Thinks Buddha Helped Aberdeen Press and Journal - Tuesday 03 October 1989, "Bread" star plays one for the Rep Dundee Courier - Friday 02 November 1990, Lucky sods get rich in Hull Truck production Reading Evening Post - Friday 31 May 1996 Piecesofuk (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Not commenting on the actual article, but 80s/90s newspaper archives, although far from perfect, are a good deal less limited than they were just a couple of years ago - the BNA and newspapers.com *have* done good work on partially filling that digital black hole. RobinCarmody (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.