Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Jewels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. non-notable, spam posted by his management Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Jewels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly created autobiography lacking in WP:RS and of questionable notability. If more/better sources aren't provided its value is questionable. JamesG5 (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updating to note the page's creator just stated it's the subject's management company, so clearly promotional. JamesG5 (talk) 06:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A brief mention in one weekly alternative newspaper is way short of what's needed to establish notability, and that's all we've got. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete This looks like a proper article on the surface, but it is highly promotional and I don't think there is a single RS out there. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have reduced the promotional tone somewhat. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 08:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.