Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Piaser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 17:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Piaser

Helped to found a local martial arts school (no evidence that it's notable), won a handful of competitions (none of which are presented as notable), plays in a non-notable band... No evidence that this individual is in any way notable. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 00:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy Delete, possible WP:COI issues, not to mention vanity article. Anna Loggue (talk) 00:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - vanity article. Could be speedied as nonnotable vanity article. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 01:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unverifiable --Ryan Delaney ^talk 02:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is the vanity page of a non-notable individual. -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per WP:NOT#BLOG and per all Thin boy 00 @174, i.e. 03:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's not much here. I'm a little doubtful about the one possibly good source which doesn't provide material for most of the article text now. Pigman☿ 06:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: And I just noticed he wasn't even first in his division but second/silver and there was no bronze for the division. Pigman☿ 06:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article as WP:VANITY, but keep Pigman's addendum, which cracked me up. By the way, I hope JP doesn't get mad if the article gets deleted, as it says he has a "ferocious temperament". Ψν^Psi_nu 15:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable MMA player per Google. First link here is a major mag. widely available at bookstores: [1], [2], [3], [4]. JJL (talk) 23:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Three are links to his placing in tournaments; the other is (as near as I can tell) a video of one of those matches. Virtually anyone who competes in anything can build the same curriculum vitae. Still extremely not notable. Ψν^Psi_nu 12:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for what it's worth, also fails to meet any of the criteria for notability of a martial artist suggested by the Martial arts Project's notability guidelines. Bradford44 (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.