Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeong You Jeong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As noted, notability is not contingent on the sources being in English Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeong You Jeong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn't find any reliable English sources. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources do not have to be in English. There are plenty of reliable sources cited in the article so it passes WP:GNG. Antonioatrylia (talk) 07:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per Antonioatrylia. Bondegezou (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. When there are no sources in English, I expect that article on Korean appears first. Also, I'd like some Korean speakers to look at the article and help with establishing a notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added sources in English. Also, I'm a Korean speaker and I find it notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelMisspelled (talk • contribs) 05:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per above, reputable sources in any language are acceptable. And as far as I know, there is no stipulation as to which language an article would be written in first. 1-555-confide (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Yes, the sources do not have to be in English, but they do have to be reliable. Is anyone vouching for the editorial credibility (or reputation for accuracy) of these non-English sites?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 20:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.