Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Global Concern (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sophia University. Merge what you like, but it's a sparse mention so I don't imagine that'll be much ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Global Concern

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable institute that is part of the Sophia University. No independent notability. The Banner talk 18:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sophia University, where it is listed with other research institutes. Search of Japanese sources shows routine coverage of subject-related events and announcements, often in religious press outlets. Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources, and does not inherit notability from parent university, so fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Bakazaka (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Sophia University per nom. It can be developed as a section there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sophia University. Enough trivial mentions and coupled with the education-level imparted, a redirect is merited.∯WBG^converse 09:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, as the subject's independent-notability claims are unfounded. -The Gnome (talk) 14:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.