Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Initial public offering of Arm Holdings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Initial public offering of Arm Holdings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company itself is clearly notable, but I don't see how the IPO warrants its own article. The differences between this article and the matching section in the article about the company appear to be mostly listing routine activities related to the IPO, such as financing deals, SEC paperwork, and their IPO roadshow (all WP:ORGTRIV things, if we can apply notability criteria for companies to this).

Finally, while of course not a deciding factor in itself but certainly indicative of something: it's the only stand-alone article about an IPO itself in the Initial public offerings by year categories, as far as I could tell. For larger companies with notable IPOs, the IPO is generally mentioned in separate history of articles (e.g. Apple, Google, Microsoft - although I don't think there's enough content here for one of those). EditorInTheRye (talk) 07:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/merge Belongs at Arm_Holdings#History, no need for separate article for WP:NOTNEWS-type details that are rarely included in other businesses' articles about going public. Reywas92^Talk 14:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Business brainrot, we don't normally detail IPO offerings in separate articles because no normal reader reads about a history of an IPO process. This is a paragraph in the Arm article and unlikely to be a plausible redirect. Nate • (chatter) 16:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NOTNEWS. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: NOTNEWS; redirects are cheap. Queen of Hearts talk
she/they
stalk 01:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.