Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inclusive classroom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 14:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusive classroom

There are no citations on this article…there is nothing to be improved on…please help. (Jessica Liao)

Keep This article is sourced. The three books listed under references that have actually been written about the concept of the inclusive classroom are enough to prove that it's commonly used in at least one sector of the educational field. I'd think about sending this to cleanup, not to AfD - articles on notable subjects that needs some help should go there first, not here. --Charlene 05:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Speedy delete~~ as the first paragraph (at least) appears to be a word-for-word copyvio from [1]. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd like to mention that much of the first paragraph has been added and copied directly very recently and will probably be reverted or deleted because, as you said, it copies the text pretty much word for word. MrMacMan 07:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and fix. This article's problems should be solved without deleting it. YechielMan 19:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is a notable and verifiable concept, but the current article needs serious cleanup and monitoring to deal with rampant point of view issues.--Xnuala (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment ~~There is no link to this AFD on the article page. I will try to fix it.~~Fixed!--Xnuala (talk) 23:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Absolutely no reason to delete what so ever. MrMacMan 01:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I put the references up. I agree that it is a fictional system and does not exist in this form in the real world which is why it is under the category of utopian movements. (209.177.21.6 - talk)
- change to Keep but clean up as only that one paragraph seems to be a copyvio. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 16:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's not copyviolation anymore because I put the references up. (209.177.21.6 - talk)

Comment still copyvio I'm afraid unless you've got consent to copy it. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 15:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useful news Since this AfD has started -- the person who opened the AfD -- Jessica Liao has since been blocked for using sock-puppets. The IP account 209.177.21.6 is also Jessica Liao. You can read about it Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jessica Liao MrMacMan 07:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The admin who blocked her appears to have been a certain User:Essjay... - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And I'm taking about Jessica's(/209.177./RainingMySoul) more recent ban on March 29th 2007 by John Reaves... seen here. (you looked at the bottom of the page... which in the checkuser's list is older, not newer). Also can be seen here MrMacMan 22:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As it appears from the edit history of Inclusive classroom and the request for checkuser above, the nominating user (who has been indef blocked) may have nominated this because she wasn't able to force original thought into the article by using sockpuppets to build false consensus. Isn't that WP:POINT, and if so can this AfD be closed? --Charlene 09:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.