Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imprecise probability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Shalom ^Hello 13:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imprecise probability

I've never heard of this before. May be legit, but I also wouldn't be surprised if its an original research violation. I'm also worried because of possible WP:COI as this article's primary contributer is the same editor who wrote SIPTA (Society for Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications) which is also currently being considered for deletion. Rackabello 07:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Top google hits were SIPTA and Wikipedia Rackabello 07:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, while I am not quite knowledgeable about probabilities, I see this concept being mentioned in Upper and lower probabilities as well. [1][2][3], among lot others, also mentions it. Google search lists up around a million hits. While it may be a niche mathematical concept, it is not anything insignificant. Quite a lot of research papers mention it, it does not seem to be a an OR. While the editor might have a COI with the society, I dont think it has anything to do with this article, that deals with the mathematical concept. A quick google search brings up a close to a million hits. --Ayleuss 07:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw Nomination If its mentioned in multiple research papers then its not OR, and the concept can be included. I'm not sure about SIPTA though, I have notability concerns with that article. Rackabello 07:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.