Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I (pronoun)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Canley (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I'm also nominating the following similar entries:
- Keep - Not only a dictionary definition, but a detailed etymological history. Worthy of being in an encyclopedia; a useful article. Max Naylor (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- An etymological history belongs in a dictionary. RightGot (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
RightGot (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Max Naylor. Georgia guy (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - spurious nomination by troll. See User_talk:RightGot, User_talk:RightGot/Archive_1 and WP:ANI#RightGot andy (talk) 23:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep all for consistency. "You", "it" and "she" are all more than simple etymology; the others less so ("He", in particular, is in great need of improvement), but (despite precedent not applying here) I think it would be perverse to just keep the three satisfactory articles and delete the rest. Tevildo (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep -- per Max Taylor. SeanMD80talk | contribs 00:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hehe, Max Naylor. Max Naylor (talk) 14:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per Max Naylor. Jonathan 00:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.