Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEC College of Engineering and Technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IEC College of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete:Does not satisfy WP:schooloutcomes or WP:nschool or wp:org. Apart from the primary sources there dont seem to be any other secondary sources to satisfy Notability. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC) * Propose a merge with the university page, since that is notable. Vikram Vincent 10:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Vincent 13:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be suggesting that consensus is irrelevant! Not sure where you got that one from. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Necrothesp. There is even a tag called {{outcomes}} to express that point. Vikram Vincent 13:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is the whole basis of how we do things on Wikipedia. It is never irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment User:Vincentvikram is randomly nominating articles without any solid statement. I noticed, he provided almost same reason (Notability and non Reliable Sources) for all articles nominated for deletion. It seems like his edits are not constructive on Wikipedia. DMySon 17:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Sources in the article do not have SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE showed nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, more database and directory style listings. The keep vote above does not list any sources to check, and the reasons listed are opinions not supported by guidelines. Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. If anyone can find sources with SIGCOV, post them and I'll be happy to check them and change my !vote if this can be shown to meet guidelines. I oppose a merge because nothing is properly sourced.  // Timothy :: talk  08:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source evaluation table:
Source Evaluation
https://www.iec.edu.in/about-us/board-… School affliated website, not IS, no SIGCOV
https://www.iec.edu.in/about-us/about… School affliated website, not IS, no SIGCOV
"List of Affiliated Institutions - Ma… Directory style listing, no SIGCOV
"AKTU Affiliation Letter Intake 2019-… A form filled in by the school, not IS, no SIGCOV
"AICTE Corrigendum Report 2019-20" (P… Government report with statistical information, not IS, no SIGCOV
"Brochure 2018-19" (PDF). Retrieved 1… School brochure, not IS
"BOLLYWOOD ACTRESSES Reecha Sinha". R… Not about the subject, does not mention the subject
"AWARDS & RECOGNITION". Retrieved 30… 404 page from school affliated website
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 11:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.