Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Hall Elementary School
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cumberland County Schools. (non-admin closure) TBrandley (what's up) 23:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Howard Hall Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Elementary school. Zero refs. One EL. Tagged for zero refs and being an orphan since 2009. Appears to be non-notable per wikipedia standards, though there is standard non-notable, run-of-the-mill coverage, and it certainly does exist. Merger of the wholly uncited text was suggested half a decade ago; no action was taken. Delete of stand-alone article (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per long-standing consensus to Cumberland County Schools. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect No indication that this elementary school might meet notability guidelines. Redirect to district articel per Cullen. RadioFan (talk) 15:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect agree per Cullen. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cumberland County Schools per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV to warrant a standalone article. Mkdwtalk 22:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.