Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SALTing can be asked for at WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hitomi Tanaka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. Negligible independent reliable sourcing if any. Deleted in September 2015, recreated with just enough unsourced/trivial additional information do escape speedy deletion as a repost, but still has no legitimate assertion of notability or reliably sourced nontrivial biographical content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete again. The only new fact since the previous deletion is winning a fan award. References are neither substantial nor reliable. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam: no meaningful bio data provided; insufficient RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT per above comments. 173.70.163.96 (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.