Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazel Tucker (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Void. The canvassing has removed half of the regular commentators on pornbio afds such that as a discussion this becomes worthless. I suggest the OP leaves this now and lets nature take its course. Spartaz Humbug! 13:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hazel Tucker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Ms. Tucker does meet the first condition of WP:PORNBIO, because of the Transgender Erotica Awards, that award's notability largely rests on media coverage of the "Trannys" (it's original name) being shared with a transportation award, and later with the name being a derogatory, demeaning term.

While yes, actors from other studios have won the award, it's still a product of the studio she worked for.

When another studio directs people to their own nominations or wins at this award ceremony, they're also exposing their own customers to competing studio's titles. So of course Grooby would nominate and award competitors, it floats their own boat in the process.

Ms. Tucker's own biography is solely sourced to a porn IMDb knock off (and we don't allow that sort of reference), award listings (not even articles), and one article in Bizarre. Indeed, the article tries to disguise its brevity by talking about the larger industry, not connecting it to the actress herself. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, looking at my edit history back to 2012, I don't believe that I've nominated anything in that range. -- Zanimum (talk) 10:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.