Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haunted High School Musical
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 21:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Haunted High School Musical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:CRYSTAL Will (is it can be time for messages now plz?) 10:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. eLLe.Le 13:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this has been announced and is in pre-production. Dalejenkins 15:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — Tagged as such with
{{future film}}
and is stated in the introductory paragraph that it is a future film; per Dalejenkins. ~ Magnus animuM Brain Freeze! 20:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply] - Delete Crystalballery, there isn't enough verifiable information on this film yet to warrant an article. A1octopus 22:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Still doesn't quite cross the line out of WP:CRYSTAL, so there's no clear indicator that this is anything but. Wait until it goes into production. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Film in pre-production. No notable information has been released yet, including the plot, cast, etc. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. - Disney768User 14:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Per Dalejenkins. I heard about this movie being announced. QuasyBoy, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - The film has been announced and discussed. It is stated that it is a future film. 24.92.60.227, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per arguments above. Nothing notable or noteworthy yet (I would expect a cast list at the very least). An article would be fine in the future once more information is released, for now, a subsection in the primary article would probably suffice. --pIrish talk, contribs 21:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - if its been annoced and has an IMDB page, then its not crystal balling. Jtervin 04:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per this search Addhoc 09:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - per Addhoc's search. 41 hits is barely a tenth of what "Payne and Redemption" gets, and that's not allowed a page on here yet, we're told.DewiMorgan 18:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.