Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hattrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep. WP:POINT, WP:WEB, WP:SNOW. kingboyk 18:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hattrick

Delete. Fails the WP:WEB, just like Sokker and Popomundo did. Deallus 23:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User's only edits have been regarding this AFD. --kingboyk 18:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why the deletion? Hattrick is a growing community, not a dissapearing, not yet.Henrik 8:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
weak delete article is very well written and has no problems other than slightly failing notability standards. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 23:57, 16 March 2006
Speedy keep'. Alexa 1,200, vast numbers of Googles including fan and knockoff sites. I suspect WP:POINT. Just zis Guy you know? 00:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Nearly 800,000 users clearly makes it notable. Reyk 00:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Easy keep --Irishpunktom\^talk 00:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per JzG and Reyk. Eivind ^speak! 00:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nearly 800,000 users globally, hundreds of fan-sites and offsite discussion groups (over 40 on Yahoo! groups alone), dozens of third-party applications written for it. Definitely notable. Bastun 01:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deallus is just envious, because his beloved sokker has only some 10thousand users and is not noticeable. This is pure envy!

Keep. Comprehensive article on a notable topic. D e nni ☯ 02:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't see why we must delete it. It's a usefull information page, also the article is well writed. --PET 02:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is upcoming article which will be good in some time.

Keep per Bastun. JoshuaZ 03:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good article and they even have their own comprehensive wiki site. --Jmbox 04:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just keep it. --TurboDaan 09:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bastun. Goblin_insane 09:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This game has like 800.000 players. If this game must go, so must loads of MMORPGs and FPS's and i really don't see why such a splendid dictionary like wikipedia shouldn't tell about these things. Hoopak 9.38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Keep By Deallus's reasoning just about every article on online gaming should be deleted. You don't delete an article that relates to a 800k strong -and growing- community and with the activity that surrounds the place as per Bastun. --Djakdarippa 10:11, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep WP:Point making nom MLA 10:24, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Easy delete WP:Point does not apply here, WP:WEB does however apply here, as this wikipedia page is nothing more than an advertisement for a browser-game which makes money on site advertisement. More users = more money, therefore this should be an easy delete. —This unsigned comment was added by 84.202.102.76 (talk • contribs) . User's first and only edit. --kingboyk 18:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

U-huh. So in what way does a site with an Alexa rank just outside the top thousand, 800,000 registered users, millions of Google hits, thousands of inbound links, multiple related forums and fansites and several dozen third-party add-ins fail WP:WEB? Just zis Guy you know? 11:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep just keep. Jacek Kendysz 16:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.