Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guerrilla marketing warfare strategies
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Guerilla marketing. REdirected as - per comments - the content is not an improvement on the target Black Kite (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Guerrilla marketing warfare strategies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An un-notable concept. There has been a fair amount of literature and research on business-as-warfare, but the exact intersection of guerrilla marketing and warfare (or guerrilla warfare) feels like original research. For what it's worth, the current article reads like an unfocused essay, with very few citations, and not much content that directly relates to the subject matter. Korny O'Near (talk) 16:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Subvertising, per WP:FORK, or to shockvertising, if you prefer. Bearian (talk) 17:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- How does WP:FORK relate to this? Korny O'Near (talk) 12:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge but I'd suggest Guerrilla marketing as the target. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Content is not worth merging: badly written, badly referenced, inaccurate, original research, never clearly defines what it's actually about, many of the examples given (e.g. Skoda campaign) are not guerrilla marketing. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.