Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guelph Campus Cooperative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guelph Campus Cooperative

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a housing cooperative. As always, every organization that exists is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article -- it must be the subject of media coverage, not just nominally verifiable to its own self-published website about itself, for a Wikipedia article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly not notable. I would have speedied it. Deb (talk) 07:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been flying under the radar since 2007 in this state. Normally it's not a good idea to speedy articles that turn out to have been around that long, even if they technically meet the speedy criteria. Bearcat (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree. I usually take account of whether the creator has "gone away". Deb (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not meeting WP:ORGCRIT, full of primary sources from the co-op associations. It could be retargeted to a listing in the Ontario Co-operative Association but caution must be given that it is WP:NOTDIRECTORY AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cant find reliable source to pass WP:NCORP. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.