Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grozio Chirurgija breach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected by author. Now points to List of data breaches. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grozio Chirurgija breach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is a news story that received coverage internationally, but Wikipedia is not WP:NEWS. In the scheme of things, it is a minor IT security breach. PROD by user:Reddogsix declined by the original author. Renata (talk) 02:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Renata3:, thanks for notifying me :) user:Reddogsix cited WP:NOTNEWS as the basis for deletion. I think it is debatable whether the criteria there apply to this article, but to avoid a lengthy discussion, I have instead condensed the article into two short entries: one at Timeline of computer security hacker history#2017, and one at List of data breaches. I have redirected the original article to the latter article. Please WP:PING me if you think it needs further discussion. Thanks :) zazpot (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.