Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Call

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:38, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Call

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is too small to recognize Call as a signifcant illustrator to the series Shakinglord:Kudos, Mailbox, ??? 02:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been inclouded in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too small? It's a day-old stub. That's not exactly a reason for deletion. Several Times (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Google shows that he has illustrated many, many books. Though I'm not sure if he meets our notability standards, I am sure that an article being "too small" is not a valid argument to delete. If the article is "too small", nominator, why not make it bigger and better by adding well-referenced content about this illustrator's accomplishments? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 02:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy procedural keep - WP:TOOLITTLE is not a valid rationaile for deletion. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it's reasonable to believe that sources to establish notability can be found. This source may be a good start, but I don't have access to the actual book. I think it's a close call, though, because I can't find any indication that he's won awards or anything like that, but I'd prefer to err on the side of keeping.--~T P W 00:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.