Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going Catholic (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Likely hoax, especially in view of the author's recent track record. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Going Catholic (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

phantom future thing with no credible assertion of notability, but not in one of the magic WP:CSD#A7 categories Closeapple (talk) 03:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: own nomination. See WP:FILM, WP:CRYSTAL, etc. Pretty close to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Contains a "director" who isn't sure he wants people to know his last name yet, and such status reports as "script was begining to commence on April 27, 2011". --Closeapple (talk) 03:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Closeapple (talk) 03:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure if the alleged director isn't sure if he wants people to know his surname, or is just emulating a director who is too cool for a surname, but anyhoo. No sources provided. fewer found. Nothing found for a search on the title, actors, director or scriptwriter. As it stands, the film would fail WP:CRYSTAL anyway, but no sources at all means failing WP:N and WP:RS. I would throw in WP:MADEUP as well, to be honest. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.