Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George M. Foote
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- George M. Foote (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable local judge. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete his elected office isn't enough to put him over WP:NPOL and the quality of the sources used are well below the standards needed to pass WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails NPOL Reywas92Talk 06:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.