Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Fraser (diplomat)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cerebellum (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- George Fraser (diplomat) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO. this is his one and only ambassador role. And being ambassador to Kiribati is very low on the diplomatic scale. I could no significant coverage either. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Also nominating for same reasons:
LibStar (talk) 12:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete both. When Kiribati begins to play an important role in international politics we may -or maybe not- consider notable foreign ambassadors designated to that island nation. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Leaning delete - unless better and additional sources can be found, this fails WP:BLP. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Here is his official biography on the Department of Foreign Affairs Website [1]. It indicates a variety of professional positions within the department, both in Australia and at overseas embassies. This posting as ambassador is his first and the biography doesn't mention any other public activities. I believe the bio means he passes the BLP criteria for a reliable source, but dosn't pass the notability criteria for a biography. Wittylama 20:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.