Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentiana Ramadani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gentiana Ramadani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whilst the winner of a national beauty pageant (non-notable competition - see WP:1EVENT), did not place in the international pageant. Has no other significant achievements. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete when the one source in an article is a dead link we clearly have no sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd need to do more research on notability, but the fact that a citation is dead does not make the subject non-notable or mean we should delete the article. Maybe we should delete it, I'd need to look into it more, but I strongly disagree with JPL's rationale. Smartyllama (talk) 20:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.