Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gate2Shop
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Gate2Shop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of this article may not meet notability standards. The article reads as self-promotion. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Richard Cavell (talk) 12:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - same rationale as Speedy Dletion CSD G11: unambiguius advertising. Every source is to its own site or the site of a reseller.--Kudpung (talk) 12:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Can't find any sources for this that aren't press releases. Non-notable. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Press releases show notability in no way because they are adverts from the subject. Joe Chill (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.