Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galoot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. I counted 2 valid keep votes, 2 valid wiktionary votes. --Tony SidawayTalk 11:06, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Completing a VfD started by Matt.whitby. Looks like a candidate for Wiktionary. I abstain. Tobycat 18:24, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but make it less like a dictionary entry. There is relevant information on the hobby of collecting used handtools which is not necessarily dictionary content. --InformationalAnarchist 18:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. As for collecting, the phenomenon is certainly notable, as a type of human behavior. However, specific types of collecting are not, IMO, individually encyclopedic. Or do we think collecting vaseline glass or porcelain pigs is encyclopedic? Ken 03:41, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Galoot is dictdef. An article on just the Internet community, "Handtool Galoot" or some such, would encyclopedic. Peter Grey 15:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Wiktionary it's essentially a dicdef. JamesBurns 03:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but make it less like a dictionary entry. There is relevant information on the hobby of collecting used handtools which is not necessarily dictionary content.
- Keep. This seems like more than a dic-def to me.--Pharos 00:55, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.