Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of the Indian Navy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Smartse as "(G5: Creation by a banned user in violation of ban)". Non-admin closure — Frankie (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Future of the Indian Navy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The same article has been created often by the same Sockpuppets, and later deleted by an admin. Looks like this is just a repeat of past attempts by the sock.

Regarding article content, it is a poorly wrote, POV pushing and a largely copy and paste duplicate of information already given on main article. By contrast the original information on the main article is quite well wrote, well sourced and from a neutral point of view.

I suggest this article is deleted asap. Thank you for your time. Talk^Woe90i 03:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a very informative one. It has been removed because user Woe90i wanted it to go. There exists an article like Future of the Royal Navy. Denying a page for the Indian Navy in a similar manner to have detailed information about the procurement and various vessels under construction is bias. Such bias must not exist in Wikipedia. Correctiondetail (talk) 04:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs expansion rather than deletion. I don't know what is this mad bias towards anything India and Indian. Such stupidity is going for a long long time. Need to stop. The article is need to be improved with lot of information on the latest procurement including the Navy's plans to induct Trimaran Stealth ships. This need to be kept updated to the latest information available. This page will also ensure that the main page of the Indian Navy is not cluttered with the long list of acquisition and construction details of ships, subs, satellites etc.Correctiondetail (talk) 04:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And on a lighter note, the construction and procurement plans of the Indian Navy is massive. It will take a whole page even to list those procurement, construction details. If anything need to be removed then that can be [[Future of the Royal Navy which having very limited acquisitions and procurment and more of decommissions, can be fitted into the Royal Navy page.Correctiondetail (talk) 05:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user (Correctiondetail) is a self admitting sockpuppet of Chanakyathegreat as I suspected. The article needs deletion for reasons I gave above. Talk^Woe90i 10:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete for any of several reasons: recreation of previously deleted article; POV content fork of Indian Navy. --Lambiam 15:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.