Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football League Cup Semi-finals
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Football League Cup Semi-finals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed PROD. Original reason for PROD was "Unlike the FA Cup semi-finals, there is nothing particularly notable about the semi-finals of the Football League Cup." – PeeJay 00:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 00:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete i think this is going into directory of stats terratory. Very little in the article other than tables of results. --neon white talk 01:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. League cup semi-finals seem notable enough to me. If FA Cup semi-finals are deemed notable, then surely this should be too. Best to spend the energy finishing the page, than debating it. Nfitz (talk) 03:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but then I can't see the point of having an article about F.A. Cup semi-finals either. - fchd (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, however that article (unsourced as it is) is still more than just a list of results. --neon white talk 07:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Barely! - fchd (talk) 17:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, however that article (unsourced as it is) is still more than just a list of results. --neon white talk 07:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#STATS. Wikipedia isn't RSSSF. Oldelpaso (talk) 08:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is why we have articles per year and not per round. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Numyht (talk • contribs)
- Keep These semis should be on the FA Cup semis are why not the league cup. Mr Hall of England (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That is not an appropriate argument, per WP:WAX. – PeeJay 16:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You do realise Mr England that the League Cup isn't the highest cup in English Football? Thats why. --Numyht (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That is not an appropriate argument, per WP:WAX. – PeeJay 16:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with the yearly league cup articles. Also this articles title should have "List of" at the beggining. BUC (talk) 09:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT#STATS, too statsy for a merge. Secret account 14:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all the information should be in the league cup year articles. If not it should be, being divided in such a way is a very poor form of presenting information. Govvy (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per fchd. I can't see the notability of the semifinals of a cup. --Carioca (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.