Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finkenberg's Sons Furniture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 07:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Finkenberg's Sons Furniture

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization without WP:CORPDEPTH that fails WP:NCORP. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable chain of furniture stores in one of the most notable cities in the world. New York Times and Wall Street Journal. Wm335td (talk) 20:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An organisation this old will have coverage in printed sources. Rathfelder (talk) 11:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep regional retail chain with significant coverage over many years.NotButtigieg (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. There are enough reliable sources, including NYT and WSJ, as well as several book sources that can be added, like this. epicgenius (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rathfelder and Epicgenius a company this old usually has the coverage required by the GNG Dartslilly (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.