Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenchuganj Mohammadia Kamil Madrasha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 18:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fenchuganj Mohammadia Kamil Madrasha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable education institution. Earlier PROD by Robert McClenon was removed by the creating editor without explanation, and previous attempt was rejected and now exists in drafts; hence this AfD. Unsourced, and a search finds nothing beyond the usual social media and directory listings. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it meets WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Without references, this is unverifiable and does not meet general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to the author - You may remove a template that says that it may be removed, such as a Proposed Deletion tag. If a template says not to remove it, such as the Articles for Deletion tag, that means not to remove it. Also, removing an Articles for Deletion tag is not useful, because a bot will put it back. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Removing an AFD tag from an unsourced article is sometimes a sign of sloppy efforts to use Wikipedia to promote. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.