Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawn Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Electriccatfish2 (talk) 16:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fawn Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article surrounds a person who does not appear to meet the Wikipedia:Notability guidelines. There is not a good deal of significant, reliable references. This article should be moved, merged, and redirected to the Iran–Contra affair or an article about the investigation. Cocoaguy ここがいい 18:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Hall was a significant player in one of the largest political scandals in American history. Sources really aren't that hard to come by. AfD isn't the place to suggest that articles be merged or redirected. A historical footnote to be certain, but she's definitely notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article. faithless (^speak) 19:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She was big news in 1987. Agree with above by Faithless. Vincent (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A significant figure in a major political scandal 25 years ago, extensively covered in reliable sources of that era. Notability is not temporary. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.