Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exercising the Penis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exercising the Penis

Contested prod. Self-published book (CreateSpace is a self-publishing house)which has not received critical attention in reliable sources (the only Google Books hit is from another self-published book, this time from AuthorHouse. 58 distinct Google hits[1], most directory listings from online booksellers. Not one review or even mention from an independent reliable source, clearly fails WP:NOTE. Fram (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advertisement; no notability shown. —the Ghost of Adrian Mineha! _{hold seance} at 10:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete self published = non-notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete some self-published material can be notable, but this is not one of them. Blatant advertising.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BK as the nom indicated. VG ☎ 14:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable & fails BK. SkierRMH (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete — A little spam on the penis, eh? MuZemike (talk) 21:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability, self-published, fails the notability guideline for books. SchfiftyThree ^(talk!) 21:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.