Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic secession

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Economic secession

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't appear to meet general notability guidelines. Most of this article is cited to self-published blog posts, obscure American libertarian websites that don't exist any more or sources that failed verification. Talk page discussion from 2010 indicates this is effectively a vanity article for a non-notable concept coined by a non-notable author.

Searches on Google Scholar and Google Books bring up the term, but used in contexts that have nothing to do with the subject of this article. So if there is to be an article on "economic secession", it would likely have nothing to do with this existing article. As such, I'm proposing this for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libertarianism and Economics. Grnrchst (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, all references the article does use are not reliable and all articles that refer to the term are not used with the same definition the article uses. I did find one discussion about "economic secession" used to refer to the same thing the article does, but it was on some old fringe forum so I disregarded it. ULPS (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails GNG. Tempting to suggest a redirect to autarchism but that's probably a stretch. Ascelyn (talk) 23:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above discussion. This is a neologism covered only in blogs and other unreliable sources. This might just be a case of too soon for inclusion. Right now, as of May 2023, it is an unreliable fringe theory. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom czar 10:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.