Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easton Mountain
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Deor (talk) 19:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Easton Mountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN resort. A mere mention in a guide book is not the significant coverage in secondary sources required to establish notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. I'm not finding anything in the media. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable resort's advert. Cramyourspam (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.