Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Scott Beattie
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- E. Scott Beattie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable person. i think Ain soph (talk) 21:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sources one and two appear to be unrelated legal documents, source three is an alumni (primary reference) and source four is the company Beattie works for (primary reference). All four are illegitimate and as such, the article can be cast in to the pit of despair forevermore. ↅ𝜞 (Contact me) (See my edits) 02:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- just a resume. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Board memberships, even for large companies, does not convey a presumption of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.