Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E&S Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

E&S Academy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A vocational school whose only source is an article in The New York Times about nursing shortages statewide in New Jersey that doesn't appear to mention the school, nor could any other in-depth coverage be found in a Google search that would establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Medicine, and New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Remarkable lack of hits other than self-advertising. As un-notable as it gets. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No mention at all in the one reference given. Rhadow (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. No reliable coverage was found. Charsaddian (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability cannot be established.--Bexaendos (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is no evidence of notability. Almeida Fernando (talk) 09:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V. Many of the "facts" are not verifiable. For example, what board of nursing? The DOE does not accredit schools of this type. Even if these were fixed, there's scant evidence of significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are a number of issues with this, not least of which includes poor sourcing, lack of SIGCOV by reliable independent sources, WP:V, and GNG. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.