Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drought (sport)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drought (sport)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. Article is nothing more than a dictionary-style definition of a common term (that is the only encyclopedic content--the first, poor, paragraph), with the addition of a whoooooole bunch of supposedly noteworthy occurrences. Full of OR, trivia, etc. Drmies (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)The fac[reply]

Delete: There is nothing really significant about droughts between premierships. The fact that this or that club has never won a competition in this or that country is hardly world-shaking encyclopaedic content. I'd say there is a Notability fallacy at work here. WP:BUTITEXISTS applies. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey thanks Whiteguru, that is an interesting link--I didn't know that one yet. Drmies (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.