Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor of law and policy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor of law and policy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't accept articles on university "programs" without real evidence of that program's notability. KDS4444 (talk) 13:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG/WP:CORP (products). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability.Glendoremus (talk) 23:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a new phrase to describe a unique program at one small university. Bearian (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with above reasoning. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.