Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Psi Chi Swordsmen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Given the history, I'm going to salt this. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Psi Chi Swordsmen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organization without a substantiated claim of notability. Sourced only to self-published material, and my attempt at WP:BEFORE revealed nothing that is a reliable source. Created at this location by a single-purpose editor to circumvent the protection due to repeated creation at Delta Psi Chi. Kinu ^t/_c 16:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 18:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 18:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 18:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 18:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This fraternity doesn't seem to have attracted any media attention whatsoever. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because it is just a continuation of a salted page, no independent coverage. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 19:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.