Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrel J. Vandeveld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Resignations from the Guantanamo military commission. The other lawyers to be merged as well. SilkTork *^YES! 14:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darrel J. Vandeveld

Textbook WP:BLP1E case. Non-notable lawyer that has only been the subject of news articles for a single event, mostly unrelated to him. BJ^Talk 19:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say redirect it somewhere; if an appropriate target can't be found, delete. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect per MZMcBride and nomination. Daniel (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The event is notable enough, with international significance., as with others involved in Gitmpo. DGG (talk) 09:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, BLP1E applies. Wikipedia is not a tabloid. There is also undue weight given to Guantanamo Bay-related issues on WP in general. Stifle (talk) 10:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I'd merge his article with Robert Preston (military lawyer), John Carr (military lawyer) and Carrie Wolf to a new article, Resignations from the Guantanamo military commission. Fences and windows (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.