Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy of menace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The merging does not require deletion at any point. In fact, it specifically mentions it shouldn't because the edit history of all contributions should be retained. Mgm|^(talk) 10:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy of menace

Article is a stub not likely to be expanded, merely a definition or quotation, should be merged into main Harold Pinter article Jezhotwells (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination appears to me to be part of an editing war that the above user is engaged in relating to the main article Harold Pinter. Please see Talk:Harold Pinter. There is no justification for deleting this article. It was originally split off from the main article at the request of editors during a "good article review", which it passed. See the section on that in archive 4 of the talk page and the current talk page section on that. Thank you. --NYScholar (talk) 03:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my concerns about the fact that there is no likelihood of expansion of this stub on the article talk page. NYSCholar commented on January 2, 2009 "Is it really necessary to propose a merge? Perhaps someone will come along and work on it to develop it into a fuller article". But no-one has. I suggest deletion and merging into Harold Pinter or perhaps Characteristics of Harold Pinter's work. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.